MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2258183320 · doi:10.4000/books.psorbonne.3953

Autonomie locale et relations avec les Latins à Byzance au xive siècle : Iôannès Limpidarios / Libadarios, Ainos et les Draperio de Péra

2004· book-chapter· fr· W2258183320 on OpenAlexaff
Thierry Ganchou

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions de la Sorbonne eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si le rôle joué par la famille Draperio au sein de la société coloniale génoise de Péra aux xive-xve siècles est aujourd’hui assez bien connu, on le doit aux recherches conduites par Michel Balard dans le cadre de sa thèse sur la Romanie génoise. Jusque-là, l’historiographie n’avait retenu qu’un seul membre de la famille, le grand homme d’affaires du xve siècle Francesco Draperio. Et de quelle façon ! Après quatre siècles d’oubli, à l’époque de sa redécouverte dans les années 1860, le person...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions de la Sorbonne eBooksSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207