MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2258259665

The Complete Cat.

2011· article· en· W2258259665 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Janeen Junaid

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian veterinary journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint (geometry)TerminologyResource (disambiguation)Veterinary medicineMedicinePsychologyComputer scienceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a typical cat owner, “The Complete Cat” gets top marks for covering all the bases. As the book promises, it provides comprehensive and practical information from purchasing a kitten, to daily care, nutrition, cat behaviour, and aging. It is written in an easy to read, light hearted manner. The author is not a veterinarian, but appears to have worked as a veterinary assistant in the UK. She is quick to point out, however, that many “Veterinary Experts” were enlisted for researching the book. In her work as a “cat behaviour counsellor,” she frequently redirects clients back to their veterinarians, and does the same in her writing; never stepping out of her knowledge or comfort zone. Having dealt with the authors limitations in credentials, another drawback to the book is that it is of British origin. In addition to prices being in pounds, veterinary clinics being called surgeries, and veterinary technicians being called veterinary nurses, we must deal with British parasites and disease prevalence leading to different worming and vaccine protocols than those in Canada. The Web site resource is decent but only lists British sites and is a bit soft when it comes to clinical usefulness. On a more positive side, Vicky Halls provides a useful appendix consisting of typical questions and answers to address problems. Another chapter entitled “My Cat’s Got What?” offers an excellent list of veterinary terminology with explanations and diagnoses common to felines throughout their lifespan. Essentially “The Complete Cat” has been written for the lay person. With that goal in mind, the book is a success, and does meet all the needs of a cat lover. I have to admit though that my problem with this book is boredom. I felt as though it has all been written before and really “The Complete Cat” offers nothing much new. Perhaps if I were a teenager just embarking on my journey loving cats, and had not read many cat care books before, then this book would be great. And so, that is my suggestion for this book. Approach it as a light-hearted, yet complete, book on cat care, aimed at those clients fresh to the world of cats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5730.483

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian veterinary journalSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207