MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2258351131 · doi:10.5539/mas.v10n1p191

Exact Solution of Two-Dimensional Unsteady Airflow in an Inclined Trachea

2016· article· en· W2258351131 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Esam A. Alnussairy, Ahmed Bakheet, Norsarahaida Amin

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia
KeywordsAirflowMechanicsPressure dropPosition (finance)Body positionPhysicsMomentum (technical analysis)MathematicsMedicineMathematical analysisPhysical medicine and rehabilitationThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exact solution of the two-dimensional momentum and continuity equations governing the unsteady airflow in an inclined trachea was carried out. The oscillating airflow was described by setting one side of the boundaries be a periodic pressure function. The solution was obtained using Bromwich integral. The present results show that the inclination angle θ and gravitational force g reduces the pressure drop and has a greater effect on the velocity profile of airflow from the trachea to the lungs. Therefore, sleeping in a horizontal position may lead to negative effects for many patients. However, the inclined position is better, and it is dependent on the slope angle position taking, the benefits of gravitational force and utilizing it to improve the breathing of the body. These results are of help in breathing problems, mild sleep apnea, snoring, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied Science→Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→