MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2258524609 · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr54.c4

Organic Crop–Livestock Systems

2009· book-chapter· en· W2258524609 on OpenAlexaff
Martin H. Entz, Joanne R. Thiessen Martens

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy monograph/Agronomy · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLivestockPastureForageAgroforestryGrazingEnvironmental scienceCropAgronomySustainabilityMixed farmingAgricultural scienceGeographyBusinessBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crop–livestock integration involves more than raising both crops and livestock on the same farm. Common organic crop–livestock systems in North America are beef–forage–grain and dairy–forage–grain. Grazing management based on knowledge of climate, soil, and animal requirements is fundamental to ecological organic livestock production. Managing integrated crop–livestock systems requires consideration of a wide range of components, including animals, crops, soil, buildings, and landscape, as well as the expected weather patterns. While animal welfare is often equated with animal health in conventional production, organic standards require consideration of animal welfare to also include animals' need for social interaction and other natural behaviors. Although pasture is a major feed source in integrated organic systems, supplemental feeding may also be required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomy monograph/AgronomySame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207