Numerical Analysis to Investigate the Effects of Thermal-Hydraulic Instabilities on Deterioration Heat Transfer and Wall Temperature in the CANDU Supercritical Water Reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work analyzes the thermal-hydraulic behavior of the CANDU supercritical water reactor (SCWR) using a 1-D numerical model. The possibility of a static instability, the Ledinegg excursion, is investigated, which reveals it can occur only in a hypothetical condition, far from the proposed operating regime of the CANDU SCWR. The investigation demonstrates the possibility of density wave oscillations (DWOs), a dynamic instability, in the operating regime of the CANDU SCWR and its marginal stability boundary (MSB) is obtained. The phenomenon of the deterioration in heat transfer is observed, and the related investigation shows that the strong buoyancy effect is responsible for its appearance inside the heating section of the channel of the CANDU SCWR core. The MSB is found to be inadequate in determining the safe operating zone of the reactor because the wall temperature can exceed the allowable limit from metallurgical consideration. The investigations also determine the safe as well as stable zone where the CANDU SCWR should operate in order to avoid the maximum temperature limit and DWOs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".