Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sound attenuation provided by the AOSafety Indoor/Outdoor Range E-A-R Plug was examined. This device, currently used in military operations in several countries, is comprised of two plugs that provide conventional ("indoor" plug) and level-dependent sound reduction (the "outdoor" plug), respectively. The effects of the user's gender and repeated fittings were explored. Eight men and eight women were tested on two separate occasions. Unoccluded and protected hearing thresholds were measured for each of nine one-third octave noise bands centered at 0.125 to 8 kHz. Attenuation was calculated as the difference between these two measures. The indoor plug provided 21 to 40 dB of sound reduction across the frequencies tested, closely matching the manufacturer's specification. The outdoor plug provided 5 to 22 dB of conventional attenuation, suggesting that it might serve as a safe means of conventional and level-dependant attenuation in hearing-impaired users. No differences were found in relation to gender or repeated fittings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".