MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2259089843

Representaciones sociales sobre la homosexualidad en estudiantes heterosexuales de Psicología y de Biología: un estudio descriptivo

2015· article· es· W2259089843 on OpenAlexaff
Andrey Velásquez Fernández, Joan Sebastián Gutiérrez, María Claudia Quijano

Bibliographic record

VenueTeoría y Crítica de la Psicología · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Feminist Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo es una aproximacion a las representaciones sociales en torno a las personas de orientacion homosexual y al concepto de homosexualidad mismo, que tienen estudiantes universitarios de pregrado de la Universidad del Valle (Santiago de Cali, Colombia) de las carreras de Psicologia y Biologia. Se trata de evidenciar la presencia de practicas incluyentes y excluyentes, informaciones, conocimientos, creencias y elementos de narracion que giren alrededor de sus concepciones sobre lo que es la homosexualidad, y que conlleven al mantenimiento de una sociedad homofobica y lesbifobica, o vislumbren esperanzas de realizacion de lo que se ha denominado una posible sociedad tolerante y pluralista. Para ello se toma una muestra no probabilistica de seis estudiantes a los cuales se les realiza una entrevista a profundidad a partir de una modelo de entrevista semiestructurada elaborada previamente

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeoría y Crítica de la PsicologíaSame topicGender and Feminist StudiesFrench-language works237,207