MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2259213705

Sculpting Theatre, Sculpting Self: The Construction of Form and Identity in Shaw's _Pygmalion_

2011· article· en· W2259213705 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Amelia Nezil

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œalbatross · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Plot (graphics)ContradictionAestheticsSociologySocial identity theoryArtEpistemologyPhilosophySocial groupSocial scienceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion, the expected climax scenes are withheld from the audience, redirecting our attention from the plot to the ethical dilemmas and questions of identity within the play. Moreover, the exclusion of key events makes us focus on the actors themselves and how they fit within the play’s dramatic structure. We must draw connections, then, between the visible workings of theatrical form and the obvious creation of social roles. I argue that Shaw’s seemingly faulty construction of plot mirrors the inherent flaws in self-identity, as identity is socially constructed, mutable and thus filled with contradiction. Nominating Faculty Member: Sheila Rabillard (rabillar@uvic.ca)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œalbatrossSame topicLiterature Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207