MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decreased mortality and infectious morbidity in adult burn patients given enteral glutamine supplements: A prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial*

2003· article· en· W2259222336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôtel-Dieu de MontréalHôtel-Dieu de QuébecInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlutamineEnteral administrationRandomized controlled trialParenteral nutritionInternal medicineGastroenterologyIncidence (geometry)Prospective cohort studySurgeryClinical trialAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Enteral glutamine supplements have been shown to reduce infectious morbidity in trauma patients, but their effect on burn patients is not known. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of enteral glutamine supplementation on infectious morbidity, length of care, and the immune system in burn patients. DESIGN: Double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Burn center. PATIENTS: Forty-five adults with severe burns. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either glutamine or an isonitrogenous control mixture until complete healing occurred. Length of care, incidence of positive blood culture, and mortality were recorded. Phagocytosis by circulating polymorphonuclear cells was measured every 3 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Four patients were excluded from the analysis, because three of them died within 72 hrs and the fourth could not receive enteral nutrition and amino acid supplements for the first 10 days. Of the remaining 41 patients, length of care in the survivors was not different between groups (0.9 vs. 1.0 days/percent total body surface area for glutamine vs. control, respectively), positive blood culture was three times more frequent in control than in glutamine treatment (4.3 vs. 1.2 days/patient, p <.05), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected in six patients on control and zero on glutamine (p <.05). Phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear cells was not different between groups. Mortality rate was significantly lower in glutamine than in control: intention to treat, two vs. 12 (p <.05); per protocol analysis, zero vs. eight (p <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Enteral glutamine supplementation in adult burn patients reduces blood infection by a factor of three, prevents bacteremia with P. aeruginosa, and may decrease mortality rate. It has no effect on level of consciousness and does not appear to influence phagocytosis by circulating polymorphonuclear cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.074
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.074
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it