Mapping the Movement of Invention: Collaboration as Rhizome in Teaching and Research the (1+1+1) Collective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The collaborative education research as art created by The (1+1+1) Collective is examined as heuretics, the movement of invention. Heuretics both enacts and documents the movement of the research process and therefore helps balance the biases, which are expressions of power, inherent in the means of expressing any inquiry. This methodology, which acts as a rhizome, offers a model for academic collaboration; it maps the movement of invention by enacting moves provoked by the heuristic of chance as in the example of process art, which can be understood philosophically in terms of Deleuzian ontology and Deleuze & Guattari's conceptualisation of philosophy as one of the three great forms of thought. Throughout the article, connections are made to teacher education and research, and it is suggested that understanding the value of heuretics can help the teacher and the researcher avoid methodological fundamentalism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it