MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2259282660

The Elephant Parades the Circus Ring: Grey Goods Versus Copyright -- No Clear Winner...Yet

2016· article· en· W2259282660 on OpenAlex
Arthur Renaud

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntellectual Property Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntellectual propertyCopyright ActSupreme courtProduct (mathematics)Copyright infringementBusinessOriginalityTrademarkLawCopyright lawLaw and economicsAdvertisingEconomicsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copyright monopolies exist to reward the creation and dissemination of works of the literary, artistic, dramatic and musical arts. Copyright attaches to original works and the threshold for originality in Canada is low. Copyright law does not distinguish between artistic or literary elements of product packaging designs and the latest best-selling novel or compact disc.Most products imported from abroad and sold in Canada bear or are accompanied by some kind of copyrightable subject matter. The marketing and distribution of these products are often in the hands of exclusive distributors who, with the foreign maker's assent develop and maintain a market for these products in Canada, often at considerable cost to the distributor.The success of an exclusive distributorship comes at yet another cost-parallel importers find ways to acquire the genuine products abroad and then import and sell these products in Canada, riding the coattails of the exclusive distributor's efforts.Exclusive distributors have long sought an effective remedy in intellectual property law to combat the parallel importation of these A recent Supreme Court of Canada decision, the decision,may provide exclusive distributors with the remedy they have been seeking through the application of the secondary infringement section of the Copyright Act some commentators argue that the application of copyright law principles to create a non-tariff barrier to the trade in genuine products strays far afield from Parliament's original intent in enacting the Copyright Act. They are concerned that such an approach unduly rewards the owners of copyright in such works at the expense of consumers of products. Other commentators argue that exclusive distributors deserve protection from the unfair competition posed by parallel importers who reap the rewards of the exclusive distributors efforts, without any corresponding investment.This article looks at past attempts by exclusive distributors to resort to intellectual property rights to curtail the parallel importation of grey goods. In most cases, intellectual property rights have been ineffective in combating parallel importation. The various Court pronouncements in the series of Kraft decisions reveal a potentially effective remedy to combat parallel importation. However, given the divergence of opinions in the Supreme Court of Canada, the effectiveness of the remedy is still open to question.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it