HIV: A Journey Just Begun

Health Sciences Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba Correspondence: Dr LE Nicolle, Health Sciences Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, CG443-820 Sherbrook, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1R9. Telephone 204-787-7029, fax 204-787-3926, nicolle@cc.umanitoba.ca It is a quarter century since the first North American cases of what was to be named the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) occurred (1). These first cases were recognized only in retrospect – the disease was present for two or three years before the description in 1981 of gay men in Los Angeles presenting with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (2). Subsequent reports, from North America and elsewhere, described an escalating frequency of unusual infections and tumours suggestive of profound immunodeficiency occuring in gay men, sexual partners of AIDS patients, hemophiliacs, persons who had received blood transfusions and children. The subsequent relentless global dissemination and pervasive socioeconomic influence of this disease was certainly not appreciated in the first scientific presentations of clinical and epidemiological features at meetings in the fall of 1981. Most individuals currently in medical school in Canada have never experienced a world without AIDS. The virus is now a permanent fixture in our human landscape. Looking back on the AIDS progression from a 2004 perspective, one view shows the triumphs of science and medicine in responding to this novel human virus. The basic science foundation underpinning medicine proved its value with the rapid identification of the causative agent, with some unexpected entertainment in watching the political maneuvering of the National Institutes of Health, Pasteur Institute, their scientists, and subsequent revelations of potential malfeasance (3). The exploration of the human biology of HIV infection has also substantially advanced our knowledge of the immunology of infections and tumours. Additionally, the intense, focused program to develop effective therapies is evidence of how a combination of political will, scientific expertise and the profit imperative can rapidly find solutions for a novel problem. A second view from our current perspective is of the societal impacts of HIV infection, beyond science and clinical care for the individual patient, in our own and other countries. The perception and management of risks attendant in blood and blood products has shifted, and safety and liability issues are now at the forefront. Senior bureaucrats and politicians have been held accountable for HIV transmission. Perceptions and practices have also changed in occupational health for health care workers and others. Universal precautions, now subsumed into routine practices, promotes optimal safety through consistent practice for all patients and all situations. Regulatory approaches now allow rapid licensing and early access to potentially effective agents. The overall impact is improved standards in many areas and benefits beyond HIV. But a third view of the HIV landscape is one of appalling failure – failure to halt the relentless global progression of this disease and the profound societal impacts resulting from this failure. Despite the early characterization of routes of virus transmission – sexual and parenteral – effective, sustainable interventions to control the endemic spread or prevent introduction into new populations have not followed. The virus has continued to expand into initially unaffected countries. South Africa, China, Russia and India are prominent recent examples. It is estimated that 70 million people globally have been infected to date, and projections for the next decade estimate further tens of millions of new infections. In particular, in Africa the HIV infection is an apocalypse of decreased longevity, economic loss, millions of orphans and political instability. Compare this experience with a more recent new disease – severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Interventions effective to prevent transmission were also recognized early, systematically applied globally, and the epidemic controlled, even without effective treatment or understanding of the biology of the virus. Yes, there are differences in transmission, incubation, presentation and other features, but the SARS experience reminds us that infectious diseases can be controlled, and underscores our failures with HIV. And now, early triumphs in prevention in some high-risk populations in North America and other developed countries are receding as rates of HIV infection increase in populations where it was previously controlled (4). How do we limit disease transmission in populations who choose to practice highrisk behaviours such as parenteral drug use and unprotected sexual activity with multiple partners? With increasing rates of HIV infection are increasing rates of ‘classical’ sexually transmitted diseases such as gonorrhea and syphilis, which had practically disappeared in North America (5). The individual professional providing HIV care in North America sees a positive experience in the management of HIV infection every day. Complicating infections are successfully treated. Patients maintain high CD4 counts and low viral loads on antiretroviral therapy. Previous means of infection transmission – blood and blood products, neonatal, occupational – have virtually disappeared. But the larger national perspective is uncertain and internationally it is grim. The rarefied developed world perspective is one of optimism that a continuing progression of new antiviral therapies will improve our current therapies and consistently address resistance emergence. But the efficacy and adverse effects of very long term antiretroviral therapy remain unknown. Meanwhile, the virus continues its global expansion and increasing numbers of cases

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.