MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2259737037 · doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1214-8

Erratum to: Echocardiography for adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

2016· erratum· en· W2259737037 on OpenAlexaff
Ghislaine Douflé, Andrew Roscoe, Filio Billia, Eddy Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParasternal lineMedicineExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationMistakeCardiologyLegendInternal medicineLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Upon publication of this article [1] it has been found that the additional files published out of order by mistake. This has now been corrected. In addition we updated a minor error in the legend for additional file 24: ‘Additional file 24. Video S19. Patient on VA ECMO. Parasternal short axis at the level of the aortic valve of the same patient as in Additional files 22 and 23. LA vent cannula seen is the LA through the IAS.’ The legend is now correctly referring to additional files 22 and 23, rather than 22 and 18 as before.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207