Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo, describimos al Canadá como potencia minera. A nivel doméstico, las leyes que rigen esta actividad son sumamente permisivas y las autoridades políticas proveen apoyos múltiples al sector. Por ello, calificamos a a jurisdicción canadiense de Mineralo-Estado, es decir un Estado que permite el enriquecimiento de una oligarquía minera poniendo el aparato estatal a su servicio. Canadá, líder internacional del sector minero, busca difundir su modelo más allá de sus fronteras. En la Bolsa de Valores de Toronto, centenas de multinacionales encuentran una plataforma ideal para monitorear proyectos mineros que se realizan alrededor del Mundo. Un gran número de estos proyectos causan impunemente externalidades socio-económicas de gran magnitud. Estas multinacionales cuentan con un apoyo político, financiero y moral sostenido por parte del gobierno canadiense. Por todo ello, consideramos al Canadá un verdadero paraíso judicial para las empresas mineras.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".