MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2259962330 · doi:10.20381/ruor-9741

Sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy, and reservoir quality of the Lower Cretaceous Glauconitic Sandstone, southeastern Alberta

2004· dissertation· en· W2259962330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andre Myles Koladich

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentologyCretaceousFluvialFaciesPaleontologyStratigraphyGeochemistryGeomorphologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lower Cretaceous (Albian) Glauconitic Sandstone is the lowermost stratigraphic unit of the Upper Mannville interval in southern Alberta. It overlies calcareous and fossiliferous strata of the Ostracode Limestone and is unconformably overlain by feldspathic and lithic-rich fluvial sandstone of the undifferentiated Upper Mannville. In the study area, Glauconitic Sandstone strata comprise three facies associations consisting of prograding shoreface to shallow shelf (FA1I), upper estuary channel fill (FA2) and tidally-influenced abandoned channel fill/interchannel (FA3) deposits. The Jenner Upper Mannville E Pool is a 10 km long by 2 km wide north-south trending conventional oil pool located in Townships 19--20, Range 9W4 in southeastern Alberta. Since its discovery in 1963, the pool has produced 7.3 million barrels of 21.1° API oil and 6.7 billion cubic feet of gas from the Glauconitic Sandstone. The original oil in place is 28.6 mmbbl and estimated remaining reserves are of the order of 700 mbbl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)→Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→