Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="1Body">For a set of forces being in equilibrium, the equilibrium state will not vary from one observer to another. This generally acknowledged fact has been called as the Force Equilibrium Invariance Axiom. On the basis of this axiom, the force transformation formula can be derived when an object is in motion, so that the force, length, time and mass can be calculated as per the basic transformation formula for the special relativity. According to the results of experimental analysis obtained by J.C. Hafele and R.E. Keating, the concepts of absolute time delay and relative time delay have been put forward herein, so as to solve any problems on the traveling velocity and records of any object being in motion at the real-time. For the properties of the force, the force applied on an object being accelerated will be deemed as the energy transfer force, while the universal gravitation will be deemed as the applied force of field. Both forces have the different basic properties. It is unscientific to consider both forces being the same properties. Based on the Force Equilibrium Invariance Axiom, it is deduced that the gravitational mass can only be the constant irrelevant to the motion of an object. Therefore, the principle of equivalence will not be tenable in theory. Only if the motion velocity of an object is very small relative to the velocity of light, can the principle of equivalence be deemed being approximately tenable. Under this condition, the general relativity can be only consistent with the practical deducing principle. However, if the motion velocity of an object is relatively large, there will be a significant difference between the constant gravitational mass and the inertial mass; as a result, there may be a deviation between the inference on the general relativity and the practical deducing principle. Take the Black Hole as an example. Even if the Black Hole is made almost completely of neutrons, its actual volume is one million times greater than its theoretical volume. Therefore, it is concluded that the Black Hole cannot be deemed as the substance composed of real atoms. It also shows accordingly that, according to the general relativity of theoretical source of Black Hole, the analysis results obtained when an object is in motion at high-velocity can not conform to the reality.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".