Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the caseload of completed suicides at a single psychiatric facility and to review the perceived deficiencies in the care of those patients. METHOD: Demographic and diagnostic data, clinical circumstances, and the deficiencies in care and documentation or both were extracted from medical records and post-suicide audit reports. RESULTS: There were 276 completed suicides over the period reviewed, yielding suicide rates of 206 per 100,000 registered patients and 123.5 per 100,000 inpatient discharges. The male to female ratio was 2:1, and patients with schizophrenia or depression accounted for 63.7% of the caseload. Only 18% of inpatients were involuntary, and only 10% were under individual observation at the time of suicide. Individual psychiatrists had up to 15 suicides in their caseloads. Deficiencies and recommendations pursuant to case audits are summarized. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the entire cumulative experience with completed suicide, including audited deficiencies in the care and documentation of that caseload, at a single Canadian psychiatric facility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".