MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2260229043

Cruce de fronteras en aula: un experimento de derecho comparado en derecho de familia (Crossing Borders in the Classroom: A Comparative Law Experiment in Family Law)

2011· article· es· W2260229043 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Ann Atwood, Graciela Jasa Silveira, Nicole LaViolette, J. Thomas Oldham

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily and Matrimonial Law
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDerechoHumanitiesFamily lawPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente articulo analiza el desarrollo del Modulo de Derecho de Familia de NACLE y sus implicaciones en la ensenanza del derecho. El Modulo Transfronterizo en Derecho de Familia de NACLE ofrece un modelo para integrar derecho internacional y el derecho comparado dentro de los programas curriculares existentes.Using a reflexive approach, this paper analyses the development of the NACLE Family Law Module and its implications for transnational legal education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicFamily and Matrimonial LawFrench-language works237,207