MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2260407237 · doi:10.1149/2.0131604jes

Probing Passivating Porous Films by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

2015· article· en· W2260407237 on OpenAlexafffund
Christian Kuß, Nicholas A. Payne, Janine Mauzeroll

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGeneral Motors of Canada
KeywordsScanning electrochemical microscopyElectrochemistryPorosityMaterials scienceMicroelectrodeSubstrate (aquarium)CathodeElectrodeScanning electron microscopeMembraneCorrosionChemical engineeringElectrochemical cellMicroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialChemistryOpticsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porous films are ubiquitous in electrochemistry. They frequently form on active electrodes due to the precipitation of insoluble reaction products. They can have beneficial effects, like the protection from electrochemical corrosion, or be of parasitic nature, as in the poisoning of fuel cell air cathodes. The effects of such layers on the electrochemical response of the substrate can be probed by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy (SECM). Herein, we present modifications to the conventional analytical expressions for SECM microelectrode approach curves, to account for the effects of a porous layer. The modified expressions can be used to fit experimental approach curves and obtain film thickness and porosity parameters. Their performance is demonstrated through comparison to results obtained by finite element modeling, and by fitting experimental approach curves over well-defined filter membranes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207