MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Progress in I-Module: Towards Improved Performance, Reliability and Module-Level Fabrication Technologies for Back-Contact PV Modules Based on Ultra-Thin Silicon Solar Cells

2011· article· en· W2260447915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEU PVSEC · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)InterconnectionFabricationCommon emitterEngineeringElectrical engineeringSiliconCoatingOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComputer scienceNanotechnologyTelecommunicationsPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the progress made at imec in its i-module concepts, towards integrating ultra-thin silicon solar cells into modules. First, it provides an update with respect to the work that was presented at the previous EUPVSEC conference, in terms of coating, placement and interconnection technology, as well as results obtained in reliability and modeling. Then, the next step in the roadmap, going towards module-level fabrication of the solar cells, is elaborated: the approach is discussed, and results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it