MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2260601705

The Case of the Extradition of Luis Posada Carriles: Is the United States Harboring a Terrorist?

2006· article· en· W2260601705 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ernesto Gonzalez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrorismPolitical scienceLawComputer securityComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"The Case of the Extradition of Luis Posada Carriles: Is the United States Harboring a Terrorist?", is the product of an independent research and writing exercise that I undertook to satisfy a writing requirement as editor of the American University International Law Review. The comment analyses the international obligations of the United States in the face of Venezuela’s request for the extradition of Luis Posada Carriles, a Cuban-born anti-Castro militant accused by Venezuela of bombing a civil airplane in 1976. The comment argues that under the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation (Montreal Convention) and the Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings (Terrorist Bombings Convention), the United States, which currently holds Posada Carriles in immigration detention for illegally entering the country in 2005, is bound to investigate Venezuela’s allegations and to extradite or prosecute Posada Carriles if such allegations are well-founded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0210.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207