MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AMPK regulation of cardiac growth‐related signaling in ob/ob mice following 2 weeks of AICAR treatment

2008· article· en· W2260914827 on OpenAlexaff
David L. Williamson, Stephen E. Alway

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society for Exercise Physiology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAMPKInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhosphorylationP70-S6 Kinase 1Protein kinase AActivator (genetics)Muscle hypertrophyChemistryBiologyMedicineProtein kinase BReceptorCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to determine how AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) regulates cardiac growth‐related pathways in lean and obese mice. 12 wk old male ob/ob (body weight (BW)=57.9g) and lean wild type (BW=30.3g) mice received and injection of 0.5 mg/g BW AICAR (AIC) in saline or a vehicle control (CON) for 2 wks. All mice were sacrificed 24 hrs after the last injection, including a 12 hr fast. Heart weights did not change for any of the groups. Western analysis of heart lysate from fasted ob/ob CON mice displayed reduced AMPK T172 and ACC S79 phosphorylation compared with lean CON, which increased in both groups after the 2 wk AIC treatment. Immunoprecipitations (IP) of tuberin displayed a reduced association with hamartin in ob/ob CON versus the lean CON, which relatively increased in both groups following AIC treatment. IPs for mTOR displayed comparable levels of raptor association in the CON groups, and increased similarly following AIC treatment. Fasted ob/ob CON mice displayed higher S6K1 T389, ribosomal protein S6 S240/244, and 4E‐BP1 T37/46 phosphorylation than lean CON, which was attenuated by AIC treatment. These data suggest that obese mice display elevated cardiac growth‐related signaling that precedes cardiac hypertrophy, and acute treatment with an AMPK activator attenuates growth‐signaling and the progression toward cardiac hypertrophy. Support: WVU Research Development Grant NT10023W (to DLW)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207