MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2260962321

FRP Rod의 부착응력에 따른 정착 길이 산정에 대한 연구

2010· article· ko· W2260962321 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이현기, 강태성, 박지수, 심종성

Bibliographic record

Venue한국콘크리트학회 2010년도 가을 학술대회 논문집 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibre-reinforced plasticMaterials scienceComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

이 연구를 통해 FRP 보강근의 기본 정착길이 산정 결과, 변형률로 구한 부착응력을 통한 기본 정착길이는기존의 평형방정식을 이용한 기본 정착길이보다 보수적이고 ISIS Canada-01(2001)에 비하여 비보수적인 값을 보였으며 보다 실 구조물에 적용 가능한 기본 정착길이 산정을 위해서는 평형 방정식 보다 보강근의 변형률 계측을 통해서 부착응력 및 기본 정착길이를 산정하는 것이 바람직 한 것으로 판단된다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue한국콘크리트학회 2010년도 가을 학술대회 논문집Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207