MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261078532 · doi:10.1115/1.4032554

Generic Modeling and Control of an Open-Circuit Piston Pump—Part II: Control Strategies and Designs

2016· article· en· W2261078532 on OpenAlex
Shu Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Piston pumpControl engineeringEngineeringTorquePiston (optics)Controller (irrigation)State-space representationPressure controlState spaceComputer scienceControl (management)Hydraulic pumpMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydromechanical compensators are often integrated with piston-type pumps to produce various control behavior, for example, pressure, load-sensing, power, or torque control. Various hydromechanical mechanisms (e.g., spring forces and load pressure) are found in the industry to ensure the desired effect of the system outputs: swash angle, discharge pressure, and input torque following the reference inputs. In a companion paper (Part I of this paper), a generic linearized state-space model is derived to investigate the pump dynamics and determine the design criteria and parameters. In the study, the state-space equations are used to propose and define the generic compensating control pump to conduct the similar strategies as hydromechanical pumps do. The different control purposes (pressure/flow/power compensating) are accomplished by only manipulating the generic regulate inputs given by an electrical proportional control valve. In the open-circuit pump, the generic controllers are proposed to generate these inputs by using one unique mechanical and electronic architecture to establish various purposes of flow, pressure, torque desired control, and even more control objectives. The controller is developed in accordance with the state-space representation and by following the models of the hydromechanical compensators that can facilitate the correlation verification. The proposed controllers are able to offer more intelligent and cost-saving control strategies for open-circuit piston pumps. To achieve the similar performance as hydromechanical compensators do and implement the comparative study, control gains and settings in the controller can be determined from ones that hydromechanical compensators have. The difference is that electronic signals (swash plate position, pressure, etc.) work as feedbacks together with other control gains to regulate the input signals. For the different control purposes, control gains are able to be set conveniently for the various control operating conditions with combining the certain feedbacks on the same hardware platform that will be value efficient and capable of control intelligence. In the paper, results of predictions made by the model are presented and compared with some experimental data of hydromechanical designs. Further work on the advanced model-based control and estimation is anticipated to be addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it