MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261114040 · doi:10.4074/s0761898015001028

Le désir de mobilité et l’automobilisme. Pour une analyse systémique de la vitesse automobile dans l’espace rural : le cas du département du Rhône et de la région de Québec

2015· article· fr· W2261114040 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Étienne Faugier

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherche Transports Sécurité · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La mobilité par l’automobilisme a conduit à une véritable révolution. Révolution du rapport au temps, révolution du rapport à l’espace : soit une révolution de la vitesse. Dans cet article, nous avançons l’idée selon laquelle ce sont les mobilités individuelles reprises par les pouvoirs publics qui ont initié l’essor du système de la vitesse automobile. Avec une approche historique, nous mettons en avant la manière dont s’est constitué la vitesse automobile depuis les usages pionniers, en passant par la constitution d’une culture du mouvement et enfin à l’élaboration d’un réseau routier amenant aux prémices d’une nouvelle vitesse : la grande vitesse, celle des autoroutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherche Transports SécuritéSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207