MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261179691 · doi:10.1680/gein.2011.18.5.289

Numerical modelling of thermally induced desiccation of geosynthetic clay liners observed in laboratory experiments

2011· article· en· W2261179691 on OpenAlexafffund
J.M. Southen, R. Kerry Rowe

Bibliographic record

VenueGeosynthetics International · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeosyntheticsGeotechnical engineeringDesiccationCrackingGeosynthetic clay linerMaterials scienceIsothermal processUltimate tensile strengthWater contentComposite materialEnvironmental scienceGeologySoil waterThermodynamicsSoil scienceHydraulic conductivityEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: A fully coupled model is used to simulate the results of large-scale laboratory tests that investigated the non-isothermal behaviour of geosynthetic clay liners in landfill basal liner applications. Results of numerical simulations of the laboratory tests in terms of water content, capillary pressure, temperature and stress distributions are presented, and encouraging agreement between the numerical and experimental results is achieved. Under the conditions examined, a 25°C/m temperature gradient led to the development of tensile stresses within the GCL, increasing the resultant likelihood of cracking. A Poisson's ratio of 0.25 resulted in predicted horizontal tensile stresses supporting qualitative observation of desiccation cracking in the GCLs. One important implication of the work reported herein is that elevated temperatures need not occur for extended periods to create the risk of desiccation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeosynthetics InternationalSame topicLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207