MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261234328

The Politics of Microfinance Compared in the Slums of Jamaica, Guyana and Haiti

2012· article· en· W2261234328 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Shenaz Hossein

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrofinancePoliticsLoanEthnographyPolitical scienceInequalityEconomic growthDevelopment economicsBusinessEconomicsSociologyFinanceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2006 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Mohammed Yunus and Grameen Bank confirmed to the industry’s advocates that microfinance was a tool to help excluded groups access financing. In my political ethnographic study of 491 people in three countries I show that politics operate throughout the industry, reproducing inequalities within the process of micro lending. In Jamaica and Guyana, lenders demonstrated that historically rooted class and racial biases determine the allocation of micro loan resources. The Haiti case is hopeful: lenders, particularly the caisses populaires (credit unions), are made up of politically active and socially conscious lenders who recognize the country’s exclusionary politics and take personal risks to make micro loans to poor women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicMicrofinance and Financial InclusionFrench-language works237,207