Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents a summary of reverse engineering of complex defects (crack-like EDM notches and other surface-breaking defects) performed on reference blocks used to validate the phased array inspection on low-pressure turbine components manufactured by Alstom/ABB and Siemens/Parsons. The scope of this program, which started in 1998 and is on going, is to assess the capability demonstration and procedure improvement for large-scale in-situ inspections. The following technical aspects are presented: reverse engineering of fatigue and stress corrosion cracks using Kubotek-Key Creator software, importing files in Imagine 3D ray tracing and ultrasonic simulation software and phased array results on 3-D crack-like EDM notches. A comparison with real UT data from serviceinduced cracks is also presented and discussed. Based on these results, Inspection and Maintenance Services – Ontario Power Generation incorporated this technology in feasibility studies and capability demonstration programs for low-pressure turbine components. 3-D data plotting into part and scanning animation are also presented and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".