Interaction between level ice and conical structures: centrifuge simulations. Phase II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is a follow-up of a previous study on the interaction between upward-breaking conical structures and level ice in a centrifuge. New data were collected from a series of ten ice sheets grown at an inertial acceleration equivalent to 30 times Earth's gravity (30g). A small conical structure was driven against this ice, which ranged in thickness from 5 to 20 mm. Interaction velocities between the structure and the ice were 7,10,40 and 100 mm/s and inertial accelerations were 1 (noram gravity), 30, 60, 80 and 120g. Cones with slopes of 45, 60 and 75 deg. with respect to the horizontal were used. A description of ice rubble build-up against the cone is presented. The horizontal and vertical loads are compared with a prediction algorithm taking into account the 3D nature of the ice loads. The influence of displacement rates is also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".