MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261404902 · doi:10.1149/ma2015-01/9/895

Bottom-up Synthesis of Sub-10 Nm Semiconducting Graphene Nanoribbons with Smooth Armchair Edges on Ge(001)

2015· article· en· W2261404902 on OpenAlexaff
Michael S. Arnold, Robert M. Jacobberger, Brian Kiraly, Matthieu Fortin‐Deschênes, Pierre L. Lévesque, Kyle M. McElhinny, Richard Rojas Delgado, Susmit Singha Roy, Andrew J. Mannix, M. G. Lagally, Paul G. Evans, Richard Martel, Mark C. Hersam, Nathan P. Guisinger

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScanning tunneling microscopeMaterials scienceGraphene nanoribbonsChemical vapor depositionSubstrate (aquarium)GrapheneSemiconductorOptoelectronicsRibbonNanotechnologyCondensed matter physicsCrystallographyChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rational synthesis of graphene nanoribbons that are semiconducting with sub-10 nm width, controlled crystallographic orientation, and well-defined edges on non-metallic substrates has been a significant challenge. The growth of nanoribbons on metal substrates precludes their direct use in semiconducting electronics due to the conducting substrate, and the direct synthesis of nanoribbons in solution is complicated by challenges of their post-synthetic assembly. In this talk, we demonstrate the scalable synthesis of graphene nanoribbons from the bottom-up via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) on Ge(001). Low energy electron diffraction (LEED) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) show that the ribbons are self-orienting ±2.9° from the Ge[110] directions and are self-defining. The nanoribbons have predominately smooth armchair edges that give rise to electron interference patterns that are indicative of the high quality of the edges. By tuning the precursor flux, growth time, and growth temperature, the ribbon anisotropy and growth kinetics can be tailored to yield ribbons with controlled width < 10 nm and aspect ratio > 60. Compared to previous reports of the growth of low aspect ratio crystals of graphene on Ge, we find that in order to realize high aspect ratio nanoribbons, it is critical to operate in a regime in which the growth rate is especially slow, on the order of 5 nm/h for growth in the width direction. Scanning tunneling spectroscopy shows that the ribbons have electronic structures that are consistent with semiconductors with bandgaps that are > 500 meV and that vary inversely with width. This work is important because unlike continuous two-dimensional graphene, which is semimetallic, one-dimensional graphene nanoribbons can be semiconducting, allowing for the substantial modulation of their conductance and enabling their application in semiconductor logic, optoelectronics, photonics, and sensors. Moreover, the direct synthesis of ultranarrow and smooth graphene nanoribbons on Ge demonstrated here provides a scalable, high throughput pathway for integrating semiconducting graphene directly on conventional large-area semiconductor wafer platforms that are compatible with planar processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207