MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261535748 · doi:10.4000/hommesmigrations.3375

« Plus de pédagogie, moins de démagogie »

2015· article· fr· W2261535748 on OpenAlexaff
Mustapha Harzoune

Bibliographic record

VenueHommes & migrations · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entre réalité et perceptionD’où viennent ces idées fausses et ces peurs ? « Trop de démagogie, pas assez de pédagogie », répond le démographe qui vise les politiques – de droite comme de gauche !Sur son blog (hébergé par Médiapart, le 26 juin), Rachel Nef fulmine « de voir notre gouvernement de ‘gauche’ si tétanisé par l’influence de l’extrême droite dans le champ politique qu'il finit par rentrer dans son jeu... » Chiffres Eurostat à l’appui, elle rétablit les faits sur la pseudo « générosi...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.030
Scholarly communication0.0130.015
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.359
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHommes & migrationsSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207