MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2261709063

Vancouver Public Library Staff Dare to Be Cool and Wild, Hot and Sexy (or Just Goofy and Silly)

2010· article· en· W2261709063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. P. Tomkins

Bibliographic record

VenueBCLA Browser: Linking the Library Landscape · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrassrootsMedia studiesPandemicLibrary scienceFoundation (evidence)Political scienceHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)SociologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Public relationsLawPoliticsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the Vancouver Public Library's participation in a national campaign by The Stephen Lewis Foundation to support its community-based projects in support of grassroots organizations in Africa that are working to address the effects of the HIV/AIDS pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0220.003
Scholarly communication0.0180.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1650.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBCLA Browser: Linking the Library LandscapeSame topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207