MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2262000296 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667008.003

Cooperative communications in OFDM and MIMO cellular relay networks: issues and approaches

2011· book-chapter· en· W2262000296 on OpenAlexaff
M. Moghaddari, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayMIMOComputer networkComputer scienceWirelessBandwidth (computing)Data as a serviceRadio resource managementMIMO-OFDMTransceiverWireless networkTelecommunicationsService (business)Power (physics)Channel (broadcasting)Business

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The continually increasing number of users and the rise of resource-demanding services require a higher link data rate than the one that can be achieved in current wireless networks. Wireless cellular networks, in particular, have to be designed and deployed with unavoidable constraints on the limited radio resources such as bandwidth and transmit power. As the number of new users increases, finding a solution to meet the rising demand for high data rate services with the available resources has became a challenging research problem. The primary objective of such research is to find solutions that can improve the capacity and utilization of the radio resources available to the service providers. While in traditional infrastructure networks the upper limit of the source destination (S–D) link's data capacity is determined by the Shannon capacity, advances in radio transceiver techniques such as multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) architectures and cooperative or relay-assisted communications have led an enhancement in the capacity of contemporary systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207