MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2262062949 · doi:10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0289

Conception Types of Elementary School Students about the Moon Phase Changes and the Suggestions and Effects of Teaching Methods

2015· article· en· W2262062949 on OpenAlex
Jun Ho Son

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Korean Association For Science Education · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemorizationMathematics educationFull moonQuarter (Canadian coin)PsychologyNew moonPhysicsAstronomyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

이 연구에서는 삼구의를 활용한 기존의 수업 방식으로는 학생들이 달의 위상변화의 원리를 정확하게 이해할 수 없을 뿐만 아니라 교사들 조차도 제대로 된 이해가 부족한 채 지도하고 있음에 주목하였다. 따라서 삼구의를 활용한 달의 위상변화 학습에서 초등학생들이 이해하고 있는 유형을 161명의 응답 결과를 토대로 분류하고, 기존의 연구에서 개발된 학습 자료를 재구성한 교수 학습 방법을 활용함으로써 그들의 이해 유형이 어떻게 변하였는지 확인하였으며, 129명 학생들의 학업성취도에는 어떠한 효과를 미치는지 검증하였다. 그리고 교사와 학생 총 8명을 대상으로 새로운 교수 학습 방법에 대해 어떠한 생각을 갖고 있는지 심층 면담을 통해 확인하였다. 그 결과, 학생들은 크게 C 유형과 W 유형을, 세부적으로는 W1, W2, W3, W4, W5 유형으로 나눌 수 있었는데 보름달 보다는 초승달과 상현달의 위상 원리를 더 어려워하였다. 그리고 재구성한 교수 학습 방법을 활용해 보충수업을 실시한 65명의 실험집단 학생들이 지도서의 내용으로 보충수업을 실시한 64명의 비교집단 학생들보다 학업성취도 사후 검사뿐만 아니라 추후 검사에서도 효과가 있었다. 심층 면담에서도 교사 학생 모두 이 연구에서 제시한 교수 학습 방법에 대해 긍정적인 답변을 해 주었다. 결론적으로 이 연구를 통해 달의 위상변화와 관련된 활동을 삼구의를 활용해 학습할 때는 결과만을 암기하는 학습에서 벗어나 원리를 정확하게 이해할 수 있도록 초등학생들에게 도움을 주는 단계별 학습 자료를 적극 활용할 것을 강조하였다. This study noted that elementary school students were unable to accurately comprehend the principles of moon phase changes and that teachers themselves lacked a full understanding of it as well. Therefore, this study classifies conception types through 161 5th grade respondents and suggests how to change students' conception types through the use of reconstructed teaching and learning materials (that have been developed in existing studies). It verified the changes in the learning achievement of 129 5th grade respondents and analyzed how to think about reconstructed teaching and learning materials through four teacher respondents and four 5th grade respondents from the same study. The results of this study are as follows: First, the conception types on moon phase changes were classified into C and W types. W types consisted of W1, W2, W3, W4, and W5 types. Students had difficulty in understanding the principles of a waxing crescent moon and first quarter phase changes. Second, the group taking classes, which implemented reconstructed teaching and learning materials, showed greater improvement in learning achievement posttest and long-term tests compared to those who have not. Finally, teachers and students reacted positively to the reconstructed teaching and learning materials as shown in exit survey results. In conclusion, it is suggested that teachers are better off utilizing reconstructed teaching and learning materials so that elementary school students may fully understand the principles of moon phase changes rather than just memorizing the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.428 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it