MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2262392607 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.051301

Ground and excited states of doubly open-shell nuclei from<i>ab initio</i>valence-space Hamiltonians

2016· article· en· W2262392607 on OpenAlexafffund
S. R. Stroberg, H. Hergert, J. D. Holt, S. K. Bogner, A. Schwenk

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateYrastAtomic physicsAb initioValence (chemistry)Ground stateNeonAb initio quantum chemistry methodsNeutronQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present ab initio predictions for ground and excited states of doubly open-shell fluorine and neon isotopes based on chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions. We use the in-medium similarity renormalization group to derive mass-dependent $sd$ valence-space Hamiltonians. The experimental ground-state energies are reproduced through neutron number $N=14$, beyond which a new targeted normal-ordering procedure improves agreement with data and large-space multireference calculations. For spectroscopy, we focus on neutron-rich $^{23\ensuremath{-}26}\mathrm{F}$ and $^{24\ensuremath{-}26}\mathrm{Ne}$ isotopes near $N=14,16$ magic numbers. In all cases we find agreement with experiment and established phenomenology. Moreover, yrast states are well described in $^{20}\mathrm{Ne}$ and $^{24}\mathrm{Mg}$, providing a path toward an ab initio description of deformation in the medium-mass region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207