Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using altered readings of normative, “common sense” histories, this article illustrates diverse entry points into interpreting narratives, museums, and place. It queries ways in which colonial subjectivities can be (re)produced through museum objects, collections, and displays, as well as the social engagements collectors, benefactors, curators, visitors, and others might have with them. The article revolves around a late 19th-century pair of moccasins of First Nations provenance attributed to renowned Cree Leader, Chief Payepot, housed in a rural, community museum, the Jasper Cultural and Historical Centre. By examining both the physical and metaphorical positionalities of “Chief Payepot’s Moccasins” as they come to be represented through various texts and subtexts, we argue for a disruption of hegemonic settler narratives in the not-yet-post-colonial territory commonly known in contemporary nation state terms as southern Saskatchewan. This approach privileges thinking with objects in an effort to dislodge colonial assumptions about place and belonging, encouraging dialogic meaning-making about historical and contemporary life with Treaty in Western Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".