MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2262768996 · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b02648

Ultrahigh<i>T</i><sub>g</sub>Epoxy Thermosets Based on Insertion Polynorbornenes

2016· article· en· W2262768996 on OpenAlexafffund
Basile Commarieu, Jonathan Potier, Moubarak Compaoré, Sylvain Dessureault, Brian Goodall, Xu Li, Jérôme P. Claverie

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThermosetting polymerEpoxyMonomerPolymerizationMaterials scienceGlass transitionPolymer chemistryPolymerChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermosetting materials (thermosets) are widely used organic materials derived from 3D-network forming monomers. Achieving high glass transition temperature ( T g ) thermosets is often a challenging task due to the complexity of designing efficiently and cheaply monomers which are rigid enough to prevent molecular motions within the thermoset. We report here a very simple route to prepare epoxy thermosets with T g as high as 350 °C, based on insertion polynorbornenes. The epoxy monomer (PNBE(epoxy)) is prepared by the epoxidation of poly(5-vinylnorbornene) obtained by catalytic insertion polymerization of 5-vinylnorbornene. PNBE(epoxy) can be cross-linked with simple biosourced compounds. Alternatively, polar insertion polynorbornene can also be used as cross-linker in the formulation of an epoxy resin, once again resulting in epoxy resins with T g higher than 300 °C and devoid of degradation at this temperature. Thus, this study clearly demonstrates the viability of catalytic polymerization to access epoxy thermosets with ultrahigh T g .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysisFrench-language works237,207