MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2262867809

The Pillaging of the Sahara: Criminal Liability of European Commission OfficialsResulting from Proposed Renewal of the 2007 EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement

2013· article· en· W2262867809 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey J. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceContext (archaeology)European unionStatuteLawLiabilityCriminal liabilityGeneral partnershipCriminal lawConventionFishingBusinessGeographyInternational trade
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The renewal of the 2006-07 European Union-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement, which permitted fishing by European flag vessels in the waters of coastal Western Sahara, is considered in the context of current international humanitarian and criminal law. The particular question of the criminal liability of EU officials who would permit the resumption of the fishery, as a matter of the law of pillage including under the Rome Statute 1998 of the International Criminal Court and the Fourth Geneva Convention 1949 is addressed. It is concluded that individual criminal liability is possible if a renewal of the agreement extends to the coastal waters of occupied Western Sahara.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207