Measurement of the B0 -> pilnu form-factor shape and branching fraction, and determination of |Vub| with a loose neutrino reconstruction technique; Mesure du rapport d'embranchement et du facteur deforme de la desintegration B0 to pilnu, et determination de |Vub| avec unetechnique de reconstruction relachee du neutrino
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors report the results of a study of the exclusive charmless semileptonic decay, B0 → π-ℓ+v, undertaken with approximately 227 million B$\bar{B}$ pairs collected at the Y(4S) resonance with the BABAR detector. The analysis uses events in which the signal B decays are reconstructed with an innovative loose neutrino reconstruction technique. They obtain partial branching fractions in 12 bins of q2, the momentum transfer squared, from which they extract the f +(q2) form-factor shape and the total branching fraction β(B0 → π-ℓ+v) = (1.46 ± 0.07stat ± 0.08syst) x 10-4. Based on a recent unquenched lattice QCD calculation of the form factor in the range q2 > 16 GeV2/c4, they find the magnitude of the CKM matrix element |Vub| to be (4.1 ± 0.2stat ± 0.2syst$+0.6\atop{-0.4}$FF}) x 10-3, where the last uncertainty is due to the normalization of the form factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".