MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2262975640

Harmonizing Tax Treaty Exemptions and Taxable Canadian Property: Demise of the Business Property Exemption

2012· article· en· W2262975640 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geoffrey S. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxable incomeTax treatyTreatyCapital gains taxDouble taxationBusinessTax avoidanceValue-added taxInternational taxationReal propertyTax lawProperty taxAd valorem taxDemiseCapital (architecture)Tax reformLaw and economicsPublic economicsFinanceEconomicsLawAccountingPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Department of Finance has changed its tax treaty policy, so that new treaties will contain capital gains articles that parallel domestic Canadian tax law with respect to the definition of taxable Canadian property. For instance, new Canadian tax treaties will no longer contain the exemption, which exempts gains on certain shares deriving their value from Canadian immoveable property which the business was carried on. The article explores the background behind this change in tax treaty policy, and considers some of the implications for foreign investors in Candian companies with significant Canadian real property or resource property assets. The older tax treaties with broad exemptions for business property, listed shares, and minority non-substantial interests no longer manifest Canada's current tax treaty policy, and could potentially be amended by the time the disposition occurs, eliminating the anticipated treaty relief from Canadian capital gains tax.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.011
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0070.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207