Ignacio M. Sánchez Prado. Naciones intelectuales. Las fundaciones dela modernidad literaria mexicana (1917-1959). West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press, 2009
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En los multiples acercamientos criticos a la trayectoria de la literatura mexicana moderna, parece ser casi inevitable la preocupacion por el lugar de la nacion y del nacionalismo, como parte de una estructura abarcadora que determina, en parte, los contornos de lo literario, tanto en la produccion como en la circulacion y recepcion de textos. Si la cuestion del “ser mexicano”, y de la nacion totalizante persiste como enfoque critico, tambien sigue presente en muchos casos como barrera o limite, proveyendo una tension contra la cual el autor pretende tejer sus lineas de fuga o ejes de reestructuracion. Buscar la salida de la “jaula” o del “laberinto”, si se permite el prestamo de terminos de Bartra y de Lomnitz, respectivamente, se convierte, en muchos casos, en el eje fundamental, y acaso paradojico, de un acercamiento a la literatura mexicana nacional, si no nacionalista. El proyecto de Sanchez Prado se inscribe en esta tendencia critica, como el mismo autor afirma cuando define su concepto de “nacion intelectual”: “un conjunto de producciones discursivas, enunciadas sobre todo desde la literatura, que imaginan, dentro del marco de la cultura nacional hegemonica, proyectos alternativos de la nacion”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".