MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263190699 · doi:10.2110/pec.07.52.0256

Application of the Asymmetric Delta Model to Along-Strike Facies Variations in a Mixed Wave- and River-Influenced Delta Lobe, Upper Cretaceous Basal Belly River Formation, Central Alberta

2007· book-chapter· en· W2263190699 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cindy Diane Hansen, James A. MacEachern

Bibliographic record

VenueSEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFaciesDeltaPaleontologyPetrophysicsCretaceousDiagenesisRiver deltaIchnologyClassification of discontinuitiesSedimentary rockGeomorphologyPetrologyStructural basinTrace fossilGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The early to mid-Campanian Basal Belly River Formation in the Ferrybank, Keystone, and eastern Pembina fields of central Alberta, reflects a mixed wave- and river-influenced deltaic succession with strong storm overprinting. Prodelta deposits consist of mud-dominated heterolithic successions, characterized by a low abundance yet moderately diverse trace fossil assemblage attributable to a “stressed” expression of the Cruziana Ichnofacies. Proximal prodelta to distal delta front intervals comprise interbedded sandy siltstones and very fine- to fine-grained sandstones exhibiting convolute bedding and sporadic bioturbation. Trace fossil assemblages range from very low to moderate abundance, and low to moderate diversity; the suites are attributable to a “stressed” expression of the Cruziana Ichnofacies. Distal delta front deposits coarsen upwards into fine- to medium-grained sandstones of the proximal delta front. High-energy conditions, coupled with strong storm influences, resulted in erosional amalgamation of tempestites, and led to sporadic distribution of ichnogenera. Proximal delta front intervals are weakly bioturbated, and trace fossil assemblages are characterized by low abundances and low to moderate diversity. Most forms within the sandstone facies represent the structures of deposit-feeding organisms. Suites reflect a “stressed” infaunal community and contain a mixture of elements characteristic of both the Skolithos and Cruziana ichnofacies. Analysis of more than fifty cored wells has revealed prodelta and delta front deposits that vary markedly along depositional strike. The along-strike variations fit well with the recently proposed asymmetric delta model. The model is based on observations of modern wave-influenced deltas such as the Danube. This study provides an ancient analogue. Continued research will seek to further delineate delta lobe asymmetry and concomitant along-strike facies variations, both attributable to longshore drift and deflection of river-induced stresses downdrift of distributary channel mouths. Organisms are exceedingly sensitive to fluvial influence and this “stress” is reflected in the relatively low diversity and low abundance assemblages that characterize many deltaic successions. Ethological preferences and burrow sizes further reflect the level of “stress” imparted on infaunal organisms within the subaqueous delta environment. Trace fossil suites of river influenced deltaic successions signify a departure from the archetypal ichnofacies characteristic to shoreface successions, and their mapped distributions may serve as a predictive tool for determining distributary channel proximity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) eBooksSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207