MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263449549 · doi:10.1149/2.0701605jes

Simulation of a Full Fuel Cell Membrane Electrode Assembly Using Pore Network Modeling

2016· article· en· W2263449549 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahmoudreza Aghighi, Michael A. Hoeh, Werner Lehnert, Geraldine Merle, Jeff T. Gostick

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnodeCathodeElectrodePolarization (electrochemistry)Membrane electrode assemblyProton exchange membrane fuel cellConcentration polarizationMaterials scienceWater transportMembranePorosityElectrolyteGaseous diffusionMechanicsChemical engineeringChemistryComposite materialWater flowEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pore network model has been applied to a both sides of a fuel cell membrane electrode assembly. The model includes gas transport in the gas diffusion layers and catalyst layers, proton transport in the catalyst layers and membrane, and percolation of liquid water. This paper presents an iterative algorithm to simulate a steady state isothermal cell with a 3D pore network model for constant voltage boundary condition. The proposed algorithm provides a simple method to couple the results of the anode and the cathode sides by iteratively solving the uncoupled equations of the transport processes. It was found that local water blockages at the GDL/CL interface not only affect concentration polarization, but also might change ohmic polarization of the cell. Depending on the liquid water configuration in the porous electrodes, the protons generated in the anode need to travel longer paths to reach the active sites of the cathode; consequently, the IR loss will be increased in the presence of liquid water. This finding highlights the strength of pore network models which resolve discrete water blockages in the electrodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207