The Legislative and Institutional Structure of EU Electronic Communications Regulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of the Internal Market has been one of the \nEuropean Union’s (hereinafter \nthe ‘ EU greatest projects. The goal of the Internal Market is to increase economic \nprosperity among the EU’s Member States by reducing the barriers to trade and \ninvestment. The cornerstone s of the Internal Market are the Four Freedoms. These \nfreedoms establish the free movement of people, services, goods and capital and are \nenshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter the \n'TFEU'). With greater economic integration, Member States have begun to reap the benefits of \nincreased trade and investment. With regards to the Internal Market, an important \ninitiative for the Commission is the liberalisation and harmonisation of the electronic \ncommunications sector. This initiative promotes the free movement of communications \nservices across the Member States. The communications sector has become a priority \nbecause an advanced communications infrastructure is necessary in order to develop a \ndigital knowledge based economy. The Commission has identified the transition to such an \neconomy as integral to the future economic and social prosperity of the EU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".