Pathologie mentale et justice : produire des évaluations psychiatriques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les tribunaux sont des contextes multipartites impliquant une variété de locuteurs, mais les procédures officielles indiquent les limites du processus, spécifient les parties qui peuvent intervenir légitimement et prédéterminent leurs formes de participation. Le discours, dans les auditions d’internement, se distingue par le fait qu’il est procéduralement limité à l’interrogatoire et au contre-interrogatoire des témoins par le représentant de la défense, la partie publique et le juge. Bien que le processus semble plutôt informel, les droits de parole sont alloués de manière procédurale. Cet article décrit ce qui se dit au niveau du témoignage des experts psychiatres et montre comment celui-ci contribue à justifier l’argumentation visant à l’internement du défendeur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".