MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On The Relations Between Optimal Solutions For Different Types Of<i>Min-Sum</i>Balanced Jit Optimisation Problems

2003· article· en· W2263556125 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Albert Corominas, Natalia Moreno

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProperty (philosophy)MathematicsSet (abstract data type)Mathematical optimizationCombinatoricsApplied mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relations between optimal solutions for different types of min-sum balaneed JIT optimisation problems are examined. It is shown that the so-called min-sum-absolute and min-sum-squared problems, subject to the so-ealled oneness condition, have the same set of optimal solutions and that this property cannot be extended to other types of min-sum problems. It is also shown that any optima] solution for the min-sum-absolute problem with oneness property if any exists is optimal for the min-sum-squared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicOptimization and Packing ProblemsFrench-language works237,207