MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263658029

Family structure race gender and poverty: The case of food deprivation in South Africa.

2015· article· en· W2263658029 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Acheampong Yaw Amoateng, Boitumelo Marilyn Patience Setlalentoa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIncome, Poverty, and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyResidenceRace (biology)Social deprivationGeographyDemographyPsychologySociologyPolitical scienceGender studies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study sought to examine the relationship between race, family structure and gender on one hand, and food deprivation as a measure of poverty on the other hand in South Africa. Main effects were found for race, residence, presence of children and adults, while interaction effect was found for race and family structure. Whites, and to a large extent Indians/Asians, were less likely to experience food deprivation, while black Africans and coloureds were most likely to experience food deprivation. Couple-headed households were the least likely to experience food deprivation, compared to households headed by either male or female. Finally, the presence of children and the elderly in a household was negatively associated with food deprivation, a finding which supports the view that most poor families in the country depend on social grants to children and the elderly for survival. Keywords : Households, Social grants, Children, Elderly, Labour migration. Cette etude visait a examiner la relation entre la race , la structure familiale et le sexe d’une part , et la privation de nourriture comme une mesure de la pauvrete d’autre part en Afrique du Sud . Les principaux effets ont ete trouves pour la race, la residence , la presence d’ enfants et les adultes , tandis que l’effet de l’interaction a ete trouve pour la course et la structure familiale . Les Blancs , les Indiens / Asiatiques , etaient moins susceptibles de connaitre la privation de nourriture , alors que les Africains noirs et metis etaient plus susceptibles de connaitre la privation de nourriture . Les menages de conjoints jouvoyeurs etaient les moins susceptibles d’eprouver la privation de nourriture , par rapport aux menages diriges par un homme ou une femme . Enfin , la presence d’enfants et les personnes âgees dans un menage etait associee negativement a la privation de nourriture , une constatation qui soutient le point de vue que la plupart des familles pauvres dans le pays dependant des aides sociales pour les enfants et les personnes âgees pour la survie . Mots-cles : les menages , les subventions sociales, enfants, personnes âgees , la migration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIncome, Poverty, and InequalityFrench-language works237,207