MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263749237 · doi:10.1093/europace/euv441

Importance of anatomy in cavotricuspid isthmus

2016· letter· en· W2263749237 on OpenAlexaff
Jane C. Caldwell, Neil Hobson, Damian Redfearn

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We were delighted to read the article by Iwasawa et al. ‘Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation using a catheter equipped with mini electrodes on the 8 mm tip; a comparison with an 8 mm dumbbell shaped tip catheter and 8 mm cryothermal catheter’,1 which in many aspects echoed our own experience with this novel ablation catheter (IntellaTip MiFi, Boston Scientific, Natrick, MA, USA) for atrial flutter ablation. Whilst we agree with the authors' view on the lack of power achieved in temperature-limited applications (a fact we have also found), we …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207