MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2263813520

Transitioning: A Synergy Care Practicum for Senior Nursing Students

2016· article· en· W2263813520 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sabrena Chriscil Wells

Bibliographic record

VenueSigma Theta Tau International's 26th International Nursing Research Congress · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumCertificationNursingPatient safetyCapstoneCompetence (human resources)Nurse educationCritical care nursingPsychologyMedicineMedical educationHealth care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

References: AACN. (2010). The AACN synergy model for patient care. http://www.aacn.org/wd/certifications/content/synmodel.pcms?menu=certification;Albsmeyer, D. (2013). Individualized Capstone Experience Proposal Based on Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) Competencies. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/individualized-capstone-experience-proposal-based-on-quality-and-safety-education-for-nurses-qsen-competencies/;Alspach, G. (2006). Extending the synergy model to preceptorship: A preliminary proposal. Critical Care Nurse, 26(2), 10-13.;Assessment Technologies Institute. (2013). ATI Product Solutions. Retrieved from https://www.atitesting.com/Solutions.asp;Bourbonnais, F., & Kerr, E. (2007). Preceptoring a student in the final clinical placement: reflections from nurses in a Canadian Hospital. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(8), 1543-1549.;Charleston, R., & Happell, B. (2005). Coping with uncertainty within the preceptorship experience: the perceptions of nursing students. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, 12(3), 303-309. doi:10.1111/j 1365-2850.2005.00837.x;Curley, M.A.Q. (1998). Patient-nurse synergy: Optimizing patients' outcomes. American Journal of Critical Care, 7(1): 64-72.;Diefenbeck, C., Plowfield, L., & Herrman, J. (2006). Clinical immersion: a residency model for nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(2), 72-79.;Fahy, A., Tuohy, D., McNamara, M. C., Butler, M., Cassidy, I., & Bradshaw, C. (2011). Evaluating clinical competence assessment. Nursing Standard, 25(50), 42-48.;Ford, K., Fitzgerald, M., & Courtney-Pratt, H. (2013). The development and evaluation of a preceptorship program using a practice development approach. Australian Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 30(3), 5-13.;Harrison-White, K., & Simons, J. (2013). Preceptorship: ensuring the best possible start for new nurses. Nursing Children And Young People, 25(1), 24-27.;Jackman, D., Myrick, F. & Yonge, O. (2012). Putting the (R)ural in preceptorship. Nursing Research and Practice, 1-7. doi:10.1155/2012/528580;Josephsen, J. M. (2013). Evidence-Based Reflective Teaching Practice: A Preceptorship Course Example. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(1), 8-11.;Kaplow, R. (2002). The synergy model in practice: Applying the synergy model to nursing education. Critical Care Nurse, 22(3), 77-81.;Kilstoff, K. & Rochester, S.F. (2004). Hitting the floor running: Transitional experiences of graduates previously trained. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(1), 13-17.;Kolb, A. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory—Version 3.1 2005 technical specifications. Case Western University.;Kuiper, R. (2005). Self-regulated learning during a clinical preceptorship: the reflections of senior baccalaureate nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26(6), 351-356.;McCarthy, B., & Murphy, S. (2010). Preceptors' experiences of clinically educating and assessing undergraduate nursing students: an Irish context. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 234–244. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01050.x;Monterosso, L. & Zilembo, M. (2008). Towards a conceptual framework for preceptorship in the clinical education of undergraduate nursing students. Contemporary Nurse, 30(1), 89-94.;Mullen, J.E. (2002). The synergy model in practice: The synergy model as a framework for nursing rounds. Critical Care Nurse, 22(6), 66-68.;Mulready-Shick, J. (2012). Integrating QSEN into clinical evaluation tools. QSEN Institute. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/integrating-qsen-into-clinical-evaluation-tools/.;NCBON (North Carolina Board of Nursing). (2013). Focused client care experience guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.ncbon.com/myfiles/downloads/focused-client-care-experience-guidelines.pdf;NCSBN. (2013a). Transition to practice: Outline of NCSBN’s Transition to Practice (TTP) Modules. Retrieved from https://www.ncsbn.org/2013_TransitiontoPractice_Modules.pdf;NCSBN (2013b). Transition to practice: Toolkit. Retrieved from https://transitiontopractice.org/ toolkit.php#preceptortools.; Newhouse, R., Dearholt, S., Poe, S, Pugh, L.C., White, K. (2005). The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-based Practice Rating Scale. Baltimore, MD,The Johns Hopkins Hospital; Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing. Newton, J., Cross, W., White, K., Ockerby, C., & Billett, S. (2011). Outcomes of a clinical partnership model for undergraduate nursing students. Contemporary Nurse, 39(1), 119-128. doi:10.5172/conu 2011.39.1.119.;Sullivan-Callopy, K. (1999). The synergy model in practice: Advanced practice nurses guiding families through systems. Critical Care Nurse, 19(5), 80-85.;Tuning. (2005). Approaches to teaching, learning and assessment and the subject area competencies. Retrieved from http://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/images/stories/teaching/TLA___NURSING.pdf;Udlis, K. (2008). Preceptorship in undergraduate nursing education: an integrative review. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(1), 20-29.;Wieland, D., Altmiller, G., Dorr, M., & Wolf, Z. (2007). Clinical transition of baccalaureate nursing students during preceptored, pregraduation practicums. Nursing Education Perspectives, 28(6), 315-32.;Wolkowitz, A., & Kelley, J. (2010). Academic Predictors of Success in a Nursing Program. Journal Of Nursing Education, 49(9), 498-503. doi:10.3928/01484834-20100524-09.;Zilembo, M., & Monterosso, L. (2008). Nursing students' perceptions of desirable leadership qualities in nurse preceptors: a descriptive survey. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal For The Australian Nursing Profession, 27(2), 194-206. doi:10.5172/conu.2008.27.2.194. Acknowledgments Thanks to Dr.Sandra Lewenson, PhD for her support and enthusiasm. Dr.Kyong Hyatt, PhD, many thanks for your kind words. Dr. Shelley Barry, DNP thank you for taking me under your wing. The nursing students at MU, you are one step above the rest. My current colleagues and supervisors without you I would not be able to attend congress, thanks for adjusting the schedule. To my fiance Derek, you are the wind beneath my wings. ! Contact Information: The author can be contacted at sabrenawells@gmail.com. Table 2. The AACN Synergy Model characteristics and competencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.016
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSigma Theta Tau International's 26th International Nursing Research Congress→Same topicNursing education and management→French-language works237,207→