MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2263877012 · doi:10.9771/peri.v1i4.15437

Pedagogias da lampadada ou... as bichas se digladiando

2016· article· pt· W2263877012 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Periódicus · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Sexuality, and Education
Canadian institutionsAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este texto se propõe a refletir sobre uma prática do fazer bicha pouco problematizada entre elas: a lampadada e as violências proporcionadas por ela. Com as produções de Guy Hocquenghem e Michel Foucault, percebemos que problematizar tais práticas torna-se um ato político no cotidiano das bichas, pois a lampadada, em seu curioso ato de violência, parece ter muito a nos ensinar do que propriamente algo que deve ser rechaçado. Nesse sentido, questionamos aquilo que a produz, advindo não somente de uma figura “homofóbica”, mas também entre os próprios sujeitos que se consideram vítimas dela. Defender-se e atacar são consequências dos jogos de poder que criamos em nossas relações com o outro que parece tão próximo e, ao mesmo tempo, tão distante. Por isso, se você ver uma bicha dando lampadada em outra na rua, não ouse tentar interromper ou ajudar... Afinal, ambas querem que este momento que estão vivendo aconteça.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it